OpenSci
OpenSci Website
  • INTRODUCTION
  • OpenSci Ecosystem
    • OpenSci
      • OpenSci DAO
      • Science Sectors
      • Research Projects Incubation
      • IP-NFT
      • Publications
    • $SCI
      • Airdrop
    • IP-NFT
      • IP Protection
    • Library
      • Publications
  • Roles
    • DAO Members
      • OpenSci's Advisors
      • Science Sectors
        • Life and Health Sciences
        • Information and Intelligence Sciences
        • Materials and Matter Sciences
        • Natural and Environmental Sciences
        • Future Energy
        • Cryptography and Web3
      • Become our advisor team
    • Donors
      • Research Project Donation
      • Donation Algorithm
      • IP-NFT
    • Researchers
      • Internal Evaluation
      • Governance Voting
      • Donation
      • Milestone Reviews
      • Research Completion
      • What's Next?
  • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • OpenSci T&C
    • Airdrop T&C
    • Researcher T&C
    • Donor T&C
  • AUDIT
  • MARKETING
    • Logos
    • Links
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Roles
  2. Researchers

Internal Evaluation

Every project proposal submitted to our platform must include the following details:

  • Team Background

  • Project Title

  • Science Sector

  • Duration

  • Cost

  • Milestones

  • Methodology

  • Deliverables

  • Future Impact

OpenSci's advisors will evaluate each proposal and provide an internal review to the research team. Recommendations on the research approach will be offered by top-notch professionals in the field. Additionally, we may assign an advisor to the research team as a consultant to support their progress and ensure the successful delivery of project outcomes.

Once a project is pre-approved, the project team will be contacted to discuss the agreement and funding terms. Only signed projects will proceed to the next phase.

PreviousResearchersNextGovernance Voting

Last updated 6 months ago